November 15.2011
LexisNexis Insurance Law Community Names Top Insurance Blogs for 2011
by David Bruns
We’re thrilled to announce that the Policyholder Perspective blog was selected as one of the Top Insurance Blogs for 2011 by the LexisNexis Insurance Law Community (ILC). Here’s a link to the announcement. Thank you to our readers, the LexisNexis staff and its Insurance Law Community Advisory Board.
Read the Article
Posted in News
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
October 21.2011
Duty to Defend is Determined Based on the Facts, not the Causes of Action, Alleged in the Complaint
by Eric Tausend
In Career Systems Development Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co., No. C 10-2679 BZ, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103999 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2011), Magistrate Judge Zimmerman granted an insured summary judgment finding that the insurer had a duty to defend based on the facts pled in the underlying litigation. This opinion is a reminder to policyholders that, under California law, an insurer’s duty to defend is determined based on the facts alleged in the complaint, not the causes of action that the plaintiff has chosen to plead. In other words, for a duty to defend to exist, underlying complaints need not specifically allege a covered cause of action, so long as the facts alleged within the complaint could give rise to a potentially covered claim.
Read the Article
Posted in General Liability Policies
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
September 21.2011
Vote Policyholder Perspective as a Top Insurance Blog for 2011
by David Bruns
The blog team at Farella is delighted to announced that the Policyholder Perspective blog has been included in the initial list of nominees for the LexisNexis Insurance Law Community’s Top 50 Insurance Blogs for 2011 campaign. The Policyholder Perspective blog is dedicated to providing comments and insights on issues of importance to anyone interested in commercial insurance coverage. We hope that you will support our efforts to be interesting and informative by voting now. The ILC is accepting votes and comments now through September 30, 2011. Click here to add a comment about the Policyholder Perspective blog.
Read the Article
Posted in News
Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
September 20.2011
Investigation Costs May Be Covered By D&O Policy
The Second Circuit recently issued a decision in MBIA Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13402 (2d Cir., July 1, 2011), finding coverage for investigative costs associated with: 1) a subpoena issued by the New York Attorney General; 2) a formal order issue by the SEC; and 3) related derivative actions.
Read the Article
Posted in D & O
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
September 09.2011
Insurance Issues in Bankruptcy Proceedings
by David Bruns
Farella bankruptcy expert, Gary Kaplan, will discuss key issues that you need to know about insurance in bankruptcy proceedings, with a focus on:
Read the Article
Posted in Speaking Engagements
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
August 10.2011
Court of Appeal Finds no Coverage for the Unintended Consequences of an Intended Act
by Eric Tausend
The California Court of Appeal recently held in, State Farm General Insurance Co. v. Frake, that the term “accident” applies to the unintended acts of the insured, but not to the unintended consequences of the insured’s intentional acts.
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
August 08.2011
Kaiser Cement v. ICSOP: Court of Appeal Grapples with Horizontal Exhaustion and Stacking
A recent decision by the California Court of Appeal for the Second District grappled with the concepts of “horizontal exhaustion” and “stacking” of policy limits in the context of an insured attempting to tap excess policies in a case involving continuous losses spanning multiple policy periods. Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corp. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, 2011 Cal.App.LEXIS 686 (filed June 3, 2011), involved an increasingly familiar factual scenario in which thousands of bodily injury claims were brought against Kaiser arising out of asbestos products manufacturing activities in ten different Kaiser facilities operated from 1944 until the 1980s.
Read the Article
Posted in General Liability Policies
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
August 01.2011
Case Confirms Insurer Loses Right to Section 2860 Fee Cap Where Insurer Does Not Promptly and Fully Defend the Insured
by John Green
In a recently decided California of Appeals case, Housing Group v. PMA Capital Ins. Co., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1150 (2011), the court examined the issue of whether a carrier breaches its duty to defend by stating it is “investigating” the claim (rather than unambiguously accepting the defense) and then failing to pay defense costs until after the underlying matter is over. The court in Housing Group held such conduct did not satisfy the duty to defend, and held the insurer therefore could not invoke the right under Civil Code § 2860 to limit the rates paid to independent counsel.
Read the Article
Posted in General Liability Policies
Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
July 20.2011
Hindsight in Bad Faith
by David Bruns
Sometimes an insurer declines coverage in either a first- or third-party context, and later, a court determines that this declination was in error and that coverage existed. Not infrequently in such circumstances, the policyholder asserts that the insurer did not conduct a thorough investigation prior to the declination and thus breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
When an insurer fails to conduct an investigation that would have uncovered facts supporting the possibility of coverage, the insurer may be imputed with knowledge of those facts. Safeco Ins. of America v. Parks, 170 Cal. App. 4th 992 (2009). Interesting questions are presented where, during discovery in the ensuing bad faith litigation, the insurer discovers new facts that tend to support the denial of coverage. In such event, can an insurer rely on these new facts in arguing that its denial was reasonable and in good faith? The law is not entirely clear, and insurers and insureds - not surprisingly - may reach different conclusions.
Click here for the complete article previously published in The Recorder written by Farella's partner Tyler Gerking.
Read the Article
Posted in Bad Faith
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post
June 06.2011
Harsh Result In Dispute Over Appointed Counsel
Even when carriers agree to defend an insured, policyholders and carriers can still get locked into disputes about who will provide such a defense. Policyholders often want to choose their own counsel while a carrier has its own idea about who should defend the case. The dispute in Travelers Property v. Centex Homes, C10-02757 (N.D. Cal. April 1, 2011) illustrates this problem and shows how a dispute over defense counsel can potentially lead the carrier to argue that the policyholder has breached its duty to cooperate and that such a breach relieves the carrier of both its duty to defend and indemnify under the policy.
Read the Article
Posted in Construction Insurance, General Liability Policies, Property Insurance
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Share This Post

Categories
Recent Posts
Calendar Archive
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
