Before worrying about an insurance claim, first ensure that you and your family, including pets and extended family, have their immediate needs met, particularly medical needs. When you are ready to begin the recovery process, we have outlined a few steps for you to take in working with your insurers to ensure that you receive the maximum benefits under any applicable policies. Continue Reading Steps and Resources to Recover Homeowner Insurance Benefits After a Fire: A Tip-Sheet for Homeowner / Small Business Insurance Claims


I wrote an article for Risk Management discussing the Federal Aviation Administration’s long-awaited regulations for commercial drones weighing 55 pounds or less and the insurance coverage available to address drone risks. Insurance is widely available, but careful attention should be paid to differences in policy language. Also, expect insurers to incorporate features of the new regulations in their underwriting approach.

You can read the full article on Risk Management‘s website: FAA Clears Drones for Takeoff

How much of a typical large property claim (property, builders risk, business interruption, and extra expense losses in excess of $5,000,000) actually gets paid by insurance, and how long does it take to settle a large claim with an insurance company?  After 20 years of consulting on a variety of large property losses, I have my own ideas, but unlike smaller losses, for which statistics are regularly compiled, very little information is publicly available about large property claims.  This is partly because they are relatively infrequent, but primarily because the settlement process tends to be highly confidential and limited to a small set of experts and consultants.

I was recently asked to participate in a survey that attempts to bring more information to light about the large claim process.  The results of the survey confirmed what I have observed myself, that resolving large claims has become more difficult over the past 20 years, multiple claim disputes at various stages within any given claim process are common, insureds often incur expenses they believe are covered by their insurance but are not, and large claims are taking longer to settle.

The recent survey of independent insurance consultants and other insurance experts concluded that property insurance usually pays only about 75% to 85% of the final amount claimed (85% for physical damage, 75% for business interruption and 85% for extra expense), and even these figures are misleadingly high, because they are percentages of the final claim amount which has usually been reduced in earlier stages of the claim process.  The total of all economic damages associated with a large property loss that end up being paid by insurance is only 65% to 75%.

The survey responses also suggested reasons why settling these claims has become more difficult.  These most significant, from my experience, include:

  • There has been an increasing tendency for large projects/properties to be insured by multiple participating insurance companies, each with a seat at the settlement table, often making resolution more difficult;

  • With more insurance companies on a single risk, insurers may rely on outside claim managers with varying and often unclear authority, who add an additional layer of participants into the claim process;

  • Competitive pressures, soft insurance markets, and lower interest rates, have caused insurers to be even more recalcitrant about paying claims;

  • Claim adjusters within insurance companies do not have as much settlement authority as in the past;

  • Insurance companies have cut back on training of claims personnel and compensation has not kept pace with other insurer functional areas, leading to fewer employees with significant large-claim experience.

The survey results also reported that it takes significantly longer to settle large claims than in the past.  Almost a third of physical damage claims were not settled within six months of the property being repaired or replaced, and approximately 10% of physical damage claims took more than a year after repair or replacement to settle.  Business interruption/delayed opening claims were even more difficult to resolve.  According to the survey, 40% were not resolved six months after the end of the interruption or delay period and 14% were still unresolved one year after the end of the interruption/delay.

Regarding coverage disputes, the survey disclosed all sorts of reasons why some portion of the damages were not covered at all or were only partially covered by insurance.  In my experience, these disputes can occur in any of three general stages in the claim process:

1) The first I call the threshold stage, in which the parties seek to come to an agreement about the facts pertaining to the damages sustained, often after consulting outside causation and engineering experts.  Disagreements on causation for the loss can be extremely significant, depending on the policy’s causation exclusions.  The insured must be careful when submitting the claim to anticipate these exclusions.

2)  In the second stage, the insured often requires coverage expertise to determine what damage is covered and what is not.  With physical damage, these determinations are about the extent of the damage, necessary repair, and functional upgrades, as well as the meaning of coverage terms in the policy.  With extra expense, judgment is required to understand abnormal expenses as well as the meaning of policy language, especially when extra expense coverage is limited to amounts reducing the repair or delay period and the resulting business interruption loss.

3)  The business interruption/delay component of large losses are usually resolved well after the physical damage loss and requires further expertise because actual damages cannot be substantiated.  Assuming that there is agreement that there was a period of interruption or delay, the parties often disagree over what performance would have been had there been no loss event, the meaning of various “soft cost” definitions, and whether reasonable steps were taken to avoid or reduce the delay.

Of course, one very important aspect of the claim process should occur well before any loss occurs, when the insurance policy is purchased.  Careful review of coverage proposals and negotiation of coverage terms with an eye toward possible claim disputes is critical and can serve to avoid uncovered losses.

Given that a large property loss is a relatively infrequent occurrence, for most managers such a claim is often a first time experience where lessons are learned the hard way.  A better understanding of the claim process will help improve management practices.  It is not enough to buy property insurance and hope for the best.

In the age of email, text messaging, and Twitter, litigation focused on the sending of unwanted fax messages sounds old-fashioned.  Indeed, it was nearly twenty years ago that Congress passed the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. § 227) (“TCPA”), which provides for damages of $500 per violation for sending fax spam to thousands of recipients at once.  Citing freedom from nuisance, peace and quiet, and conservation of ink and paper, among other reasons, courts across the country have found liability for violations of the TCPA.  Many courts, including the Supreme Courts of  Florida, Illinois, and Massachusetts, and courts of appeal in Ohio and Texas, have also found that violations of the TCPA are covered by the “personal and advertising injury” coverage in the standard commercial general liability policy, which typically includes the “oral or written publication of material that violates a person’s right of privacy.”  Continue Reading California Court Of Appeal Decides That Blast Faxing Does Not Violate The Recipient’s Right Of Privacy For Purposes Of Insurance Coverage